Search results

Yeah they would have been in today's patch otherwise. The map says end feb though: So we should see haven, mounts, taming, and ecumenical magic next patch unless any of those things get pushed back. Should be an absolutely huge patch for people whose build hasn't made it in yet as most builds...

@Evelyn - I actually think if diminishing returns get implemented in isolation that the build that would benefit most would be hybrids. Right now one of the most major controls on a hybrid's power is that you have to balance between strength and int with neither helping both of your functions...

Nope. My main will be balanced entirely around combat. I will not be wasting points in taming or thievery unless they are made combat relevant or moved to professions where they belong. I will not be putting points in Phyche unless it helps my combat build. If the game is good enough to justify...

To give a very spitball version of the system I'd like to see. Under 50: 1 attribute point = 1 point in that attribute 60-70: 2 attribute points = 1 point in that attribute 70-80: 3 attribute points = 1 point in that attribute 80-90: 4 attribute points = 1 point in that attribute 90-100: 5...

Yes but diminishing returns are a must. I don't think 1 point of psyche should be as valuable as one point of strength for most melee builds for instance but I do think that the cost of an attribute should go up proportional to how high you already have it in such a way that eventually balancing...

We're kind of seeing this with Veela getting a bonus to bow strength draw weight but if you really wanted to throw a wrench in the system you could consider implementing things such as this: Zen Archery This is one of many such feats and class abilities found in D&D 3.5 While it draws some...

Mounts, taming, and magic are all supposed to be in the late February patch. So yes.

Yeah, it's important to make every attribute offer a stat that is good for any build. But they don't have to be anywhere near equal in value. Strength and Con should be a lot more valuable to a foot fighter than phyche. But there should come a point where it's literally a decision of the...

I want to see races meaningful to some degree because we've seen what happens when they take normalizing races to an extreme in a very similar title: This: Became this: Why God, why, would you turn one of the coolest races in a fantasy game at the time into the cringe-worthy furries...

Going to throw out rerolls, and character creation are 90% of the reason I didn't play more MO1. It was seriously that bad. In a sandbox title I want my character to evolve as I do as a player. I learn new things, decides I like different things, make changes to my build and watch my character...

Their new system resembles the old system way too much. The issue of needing to know your build before you create your character so you can pick an appropriate race and age is still way too big of a deal. My suggestions. 1. Remove Age entirely. I mean I can put grey hair on an 18-year-old. So...

That's why my idea doesn't require you to stand around sieging if you aren't being actively contested. The problem with "We just need window siege at prime time" is whose prime time are you talking? Will it be American guys waking up at 3am? EU guys? Aussies? Which timezone is actually allowed...

Plus it's really handy for not drowning when you slide to the depths of the ocean like you're on a sheet of greased glass if you dabble your toes in a stream with anything other than pocket lint in your inventory.

I could see that. Like you get XP for killing a player once a day. You might get people who farm alts but the benefit would be limited and you could probably curtail that even a little by having some kind of hidden PvP rating and having kills on people without decent rating worth practically...

I like the idea of PvP generating skill. But I'm unsure what system we could use to do that without making it possible to level up on a friend. You could decrease XP within a certain radius of guarded areas I suppose. That doesn't really give XP for PvP but it would encourage people to level in...

I can understand the general sentiment of "you should level a skill by using it" but this is a rule I would put much lower in importance than "a leveling system should be at least slightly fun / not incredibly tedious". If we do something that is both, great. But I'd much rather see a system...

If a macro is required and allowed to do something efficiently in-game, I consider that a MAJOR failure on the part of the developers. Any kind of macro that plays the game for you not being an outright bannable offense is a major failure. People shouldn't have to sit there and decipher "Ok so I...

I'd suggest damage multipliers for backhits. In Darkfall backhits did double damage. Adding something like this for certain weapons/builds would be one of the best ways to make roguey high-dex melee better. Because I fully agree, some kind of consistent bonus in specific conditions is a lot more...

K/D doesn't have a place in a game like this. If I take down the biggest baddest guy in the game in his full set of ohgmium with is fully optimized potions that's one kill. If I go to the graveyard with five of my best friend and gank an ungeared newby, that's one kill. There is such a wide...

I didn't get my specific results for this one because it wanted me to sign up but I've tested multiple times as an ENFJ. The ones I took were through college as well so fairly reliable.