No. I'm not just thinking of 1v1 scenarios. I don't even care about 1v1 scenarios all that much. If you're facing greater numbers of a well-coordinated largely ranged force and you don't have people capable of closing on them to negate them/they have people who are good at covering for them... then game over I guess.
You were expecting to win that fight? Why? Lol
There are definitely ways to beat it though. Just not "I can flick my sword around the screen faster so I should be able to beat everything" ways.
But you guys keep painting pictures of smart opponents using smart tactics with superior numbers, you doing nothing clever to counter them, and then you are dumbfounded they could beat you because you have faster reflexes. I don't see any problem with this. That you actually have to play dumb to lose with a greater force and tactics mean more than what you consider "skill" to be.
You were expecting to win that fight? Why? Lol
There are definitely ways to beat it though. Just not "I can flick my sword around the screen faster so I should be able to beat everything" ways.
But you guys keep painting pictures of smart opponents using smart tactics with superior numbers, you doing nothing clever to counter them, and then you are dumbfounded they could beat you because you have faster reflexes. I don't see any problem with this. That you actually have to play dumb to lose with a greater force and tactics mean more than what you consider "skill" to be.
Last edited: