Add Moment of Vulnerability after Parry

Backyard Employee

Active member
Oct 30, 2021
273
199
43
What could sustain more life one earth or three earths?

what would fit better 100 rats in one cage or 33 rats in 3 cages.

what would be more comfortable living 10 families in 1 home or 5 homes.
Every habitat has some kind of max population. 1 server would limit it way more.
One server almost seems like planning to fail. At some point it’s going to be overcrowded and people will leave. If it’s under crowded it means game wasn’t engaging enough

sure you can have too many servers. There’s an optimal number though and it’s probably greater than 1

100% agree.
 

RaptorBlackz

Member
Sep 4, 2020
69
70
18
Australia
When actual game mechanics suffer like pve that I showed above. Then it’s time to abandon the 1 server model. I’m cool with 1 server until I have to contend with what the 7 people from Australia who play this game want for every mechanic
7 Australians is an understatement, There are plenty of Australian players whom are interested/playing.

The reality is it's not the high-pingers fault for wanting a fair-game with a 1server, We also want a fair experience and had even mentioned centralizing the server for everyone which in term would reduce our overall ping.

SV just seems confident in keeping their assets/servers in EU.

The blame is not on the high-pingers but squarely on SV and their pipe-dream of 1server in a location that is not fair for others.
 
Apr 11, 2021
74
70
18
Gaul'kor
The single server model will drive so many people away.

Why would you play a game where you are always at a disadvantage to other players.

That, or realize your gameplay experience is worse because of it due to how things are balanced and set up like combat. The early alpha combat was far superior and only needed some changes.
 

Backyard Employee

Active member
Oct 30, 2021
273
199
43
7 Australians is an understatement, There are plenty of Australian players whom are interested/playing.

The reality is it's not the high-pingers fault for wanting a fair-game with a 1server, We also want a fair experience and had even mentioned centralizing the server for everyone which in term would reduce our overall ping.

SV just seems confident in keeping their assets/servers in EU.

The blame is not on the high-pingers but squarely on SV and their pipe-dream of 1server in a location that is not fair for others.

I honestly laughed reading this. No one is saying it's any single country of people's fault, just that the idea BEHIND IT is so laughably bad.

A game shouldn't be balanced and made to work for someone who has 250 to 300 ping in a game. It's just so stupid and pointless. You say 'fair game' but the fact the game suffers as a whole, no one wins. AU players just get a sub-par product and still have ping issues, just like everyone else not in the EU.. except they also get to live with the sub-par product.

At this point being an NA player I wouldn't be happy having the single server be in NA, because the game would still have so many issues with it which others including NA players will still have to deal with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Teknique