Search results

I'm not really sure what the "solution" is. The combat system you have now was designed to reduced spinning. It really just made the game worse without changing any of the intended optics. Just gave less outplay potential and more ping based.

When I look at MO2 I do not at all see a sandbox, political, hardcore, realistic game. Instead I see a contrived themepark with shallow systems across the board, fake sieging and meaningless politics. All with the clunkiest controls ever seen in a game.

I looked up Mortal Online 2 sieges and could barely find anything. Is politics/war even really a thing, more than just technically existing?

Yo kinda ngl

The number you are looking for is 100

Just seeing the game is enough to make me feel sick.

They need to reduce the point cost of things in general. They added so many useless primaries generally speaking Interesting take. I to some extent feel the opposite. I really really enjoyed the types of characters you could create in the first game. In the 2nd game I feel like there are too...

This. Especially pets I think should be pve main tanks. And some small ability to cc could be cool assuming they could balance it which is unlikely

Dear god this game. I posted this like what 2 years ago. -Reduce pet damage vs players by 75% -Increase pet damage vs NPCS by 75% -Make pets resurrectable -Give pets some interesting passive/active abilities (nothing crazy)...

Lmao the people who said what players really want is npcs that gang fuck you. Jesus mo2 alpha was an L

Ah, yes. The age old argument that all video games need to do to be successful is regress to the mean ad infinitum. Eventually the game will be so exciting that you can play it with your monitor off! Using MO2 to make this argument is silly. When the game is so bad in so many aspects. "Of these...

Solo player experience is a massive and very valid reason, however the game is nearly incomplete in all aspects. The only accurate answer to this question is "bad design". More specifically? every single thing about it

Honestly most people in mo2 are pretty friendly. There are people who sound exactly like you on the world of warcraft forums. No joke nearly identical.

Working as nintendo.

Mo2 is far better on certain aspects and far worse on certain aspects. That’s the actual truth

Agree, however i'd prefer to see trinket drop rates adjusted instead of all localized to one dungeon that will be gate kept from solo players. Why is it that the drop rate is already super low, then the gem drop rate is like nonexistent beyond amethyst.

In the interest of honesty and transparency the game has improved a lot, much more than I realized, by increasing xp and gold gains through the task system. I was able to direct a friend to do that as opposed to just saying idk farm walkers for 10s a head. In regards to the combat I’ve called...

You're saying it would look stupid and draw attention if they were naked? As long as the system makes sense then not too concerned about the specifics. If its going to be you risk expensive thieving tools but can't steal more than they even cost before dying no one is gonna do it obviously.

Got bad news for you. Henrik said on that same stream that the thievery system will be tweaked so that you can’t just do it naked. You’re probably going to be risking more gold than you’re making similar to sieging.

Honest opinion- bigger fish to fry. It’s just another variant to the foot fighter which already has speedy boy and tanky boy, big damage boy would be cool but w.e. Meanwhile hybrid, mounted combat, mounted archer, beast masters are all train wreck classes with 0 gameplay loop and 0 thought on...