Search results

No, the current approach is fine and comes with a fair amount of merit in it's intent to promote a healthy community dynamic through reputation and meaningful character choice. Personally I'm happy with this decision and in my book it's pros outweigh the cons. The only inflexibility right now...

Server performance is absolutely the #1 priority for SV and this does feel like a server performance concern given it can potentially reduce the amount of per player data being requested about other players being loaded in at range. I don't see however, the problem with a small increase in data...

I prefer the idea of one world server. It does protect against pop issues the game "could" have, to a degree. It's also a nice change of pace as well to be able to play with people from all walks of life which you don't tend to see anymore in online games due to everything being regionally...

Footspeed has a high enough impact over movement speed without the attribute consideration. Thus, just max everyone's footspeed at 100 on login.

Yes you're right, it would need to be manageable while still being mobile. How I foresaw it was: Gear 1: Regen equivalent to standing still Gear 2: Regen equivalent to running, and apply the combat manoeuvring stam regen when in combat mode Gear 3: 1/2 equal to sprinting Gear 4: Equal to sprinting?

Agreed. I'd be happy if maybe in gear 1 or 2 it's a slow regen much like it is for the horse stam now. Not to forget stam reserves and therefore the requirement every so often to potential dismount and rest/campfire/eat etc.

Try watching the video then telling that to an Aussie player that is supposed to be competitive in the eyes of the developers.

It adds a higher skill cap to mounted gameplay. It adds a logical path for other dismount mechanics to exist directly proportional to the players stamina management in a fight. It adds value to attributes and stats that give stamina and stamina regen for MC players. Gives Dex a higher value in...

If this is a "realism" argument, are you suggesting it requires no physical effort to ride a horse at speed?

Player stamina has no real impact while on horse back other than Mounted Archery. Even then it's negligible. I suggest we add stamina drain to the player proportional to the stamina drain of the horse, e.g. in gears 3 or 4. From there, make the current stamina level increase or decrease the...

We need /duel. Both players go grey to each other. No guard repercussions. No ally status.

Label bags, name food, name potions.

Removing something because in it's current state it's imbalanced isn't the solution. We don't want to remove content from the game as we don't have the luxury to do so. Balancing is achievable, the devs just need to decide where they want to put the skill cap into it. Time is not an appropriate...

A simple stamina system would actually work really well. Even something basic like: Passively drain stamina when a pet is in attack state (fixed amount say 3 stamina every second). Pets should regain stamina at the same rate but have different stamina pools based on animal type and level...

Sure but this is an MMO with costs. Those games offload the cost of hosting to the community.

I don't sorry. Those streams can be long haha.

I disagree. Weakspots are not critical hits, they're amour penetration procs. Your weapon skills tighten the min damage variation you're seeing. Assuming you're talking about archery, at 100 archery on a dummy I get variance of around 1-2 damage (obviously dummies have 0 mitigation). Also...

I don't think a "classifieds/bounty/noticeboard" idea is bad per say, but simply because something didn't work as well for you or others in a previous iteration, doesn't instantly invalidate the core design paradigms it was following. This is why you will struggle to get community buy in to some...

When allocating Dex, it does mention it will improve their move speed. If anything, everyone should get base sprinting and footspeed at 100. There's no reason at the very least an 18 year old doesn't know how to walk/run/sprint. They can then remove points from there later when they figure out...

EDIT: I can appreciate that not having enough content for your players to do could encourage them toward griefing new players for the lulz. That said, I think this will always be an issue especially considering there will always be groups who don't have a large investment in TC/Housing anyway.