Let's start with the "
there are more important things" disclaimer. Those are totally unnecessary in any Feedback/SUggestions thread. Star Vault decides* what's important, what their daily agenda is, and what's next. People who complain about how unimportant a suggestion is are wasting every reader's time.
*More like, Star Vault has already got priorities and will add what's of lower priority to the workflow as they find time and resources. They can't afford to sit idle.
There are more important things, but somehow that caught my eye immediately, becuase it does not seems to fit in the environment, but that´s just my opinion.
Trees in pots are a very old idea-- as old as Florence, as old as Rome, probably as old as Babylon. Just a fact, and I'm not arguing it from "realism".
Tastes may be different, but I don't like the design at all. Why would someone plant such a big a tree in a pot ...
Especially the scale of the pots and the trees looks wired. Rater make it looklike that ot fix the scale.
You may think the scale of the pot alone looks weird, but trees half that size would need a pot that big, That is realism, and Star Vault is free to disregard it for convenience or any other reason.
My question about the design is 'how did a tree planted in a pot that's so small for it get that big?'
Because it probably wouldn't. That does indeed look weird.
This picture is of a nicely trimmed little bush or vine in a small pot.
This is not a tree.
This is a bush. You're comparing apples and oranges, except instead of an orange tree you're actually using a small berry bush for the comparison. It doesn't make your point.
