Hypothetically:
Until Myrland
(¿currently pacified? ¿Myrland Khurites under the heel of the steel boot of Tindrem? ¿Risar not invading en masse? ¿Sarducaans not swarming in drug-fuelled religious fervour from over the forbidding sea?)
is actively at war,
I would reckon that you all don't need any more of an Emperor than you've already got— a party-going, paper-clad costume-hanger, seldom if ever seen.
Until then, you'd only need what you've already (somewhat informally) got in addition:
But I'm not sure that Myrland's populace, despite their ancestors having survived the Irruption, are equipped to deal with such a radical change as not trying hard to have an 'active' Emperor.
*/looks for tea to sip*
Until Myrland
(¿currently pacified? ¿Myrland Khurites under the heel of the steel boot of Tindrem? ¿Risar not invading en masse? ¿Sarducaans not swarming in drug-fuelled religious fervour from over the forbidding sea?)
is actively at war,
I would reckon that you all don't need any more of an Emperor than you've already got— a party-going, paper-clad costume-hanger, seldom if ever seen.
Until then, you'd only need what you've already (somewhat informally) got in addition:
a Senate of old (not to say 'senile', though 'senator' comes from the same root) men and a few ambitious generals whose numbers will prune themselves as the internecine tides of regional battle & rebellion rage back and forth.
But I'm not sure that Myrland's populace, despite their ancestors having survived the Irruption, are equipped to deal with such a radical change as not trying hard to have an 'active' Emperor.
*/looks for tea to sip*
Last edited: