Search results

Exploits are so beautiful. I think we shouldn't refer to this game as Mortal Online 2 as that gives a false assumption of a sequel. Lets refer to MO2 as Pre-space Thursars the Prequel to Space Thursars.

The combat looks horrifically bad. Which in the MMORPG world, is a positive indicator for a game's success.

No meaningful politics. Why come on the forums? No need to come and boast about being the Grand Eternal Admiral of the Flaming Porcupine, when its take 10000 gold and 48 hrs to siege a donkey shed.

Yeah I agree with this. A large portion of your defense was positioning. Stickybacking someone 100-0 was a rare event and a standout play. Stickyback is free in mo2, infact its so unremarkable that I don't think anyone even has the term in their vocabulary anymore.

I’m an advocate of mo1 combat as it was in early alpha. I used to literally be sweating after duels with patwins. There are things they can do, making weapons feel like they have some actual weight to them. Mo1 combat looked terrible from the 3rd person but felt amazing from the first. The...

I'm not really sure what the "solution" is. The combat system you have now was designed to reduced spinning. It really just made the game worse without changing any of the intended optics. Just gave less outplay potential and more ping based.

When I look at MO2 I do not at all see a sandbox, political, hardcore, realistic game. Instead I see a contrived themepark with shallow systems across the board, fake sieging and meaningless politics. All with the clunkiest controls ever seen in a game.

I looked up Mortal Online 2 sieges and could barely find anything. Is politics/war even really a thing, more than just technically existing?

Yo kinda ngl

The number you are looking for is 100

Just seeing the game is enough to make me feel sick.

They need to reduce the point cost of things in general. They added so many useless primaries generally speaking Interesting take. I to some extent feel the opposite. I really really enjoyed the types of characters you could create in the first game. In the 2nd game I feel like there are too...

This. Especially pets I think should be pve main tanks. And some small ability to cc could be cool assuming they could balance it which is unlikely

Dear god this game. I posted this like what 2 years ago. -Reduce pet damage vs players by 75% -Increase pet damage vs NPCS by 75% -Make pets resurrectable -Give pets some interesting passive/active abilities (nothing crazy)...

Lmao the people who said what players really want is npcs that gang fuck you. Jesus mo2 alpha was an L

Ah, yes. The age old argument that all video games need to do to be successful is regress to the mean ad infinitum. Eventually the game will be so exciting that you can play it with your monitor off! Using MO2 to make this argument is silly. When the game is so bad in so many aspects. "Of these...

Solo player experience is a massive and very valid reason, however the game is nearly incomplete in all aspects. The only accurate answer to this question is "bad design". More specifically? every single thing about it

Honestly most people in mo2 are pretty friendly. There are people who sound exactly like you on the world of warcraft forums. No joke nearly identical.

Working as nintendo.

Mo2 is far better on certain aspects and far worse on certain aspects. That’s the actual truth