Search results

this clade is huge for humans lmao , you would hafto replace it with somthing super substantial to compete with other race/clade gifts. human hasto compete with lets see .... super speed, super stamina , lower reagent cost , seeing threw walls , ogpipes , rocksolid , extra weakspot , age clade ...

this is not constructive feedback and does not lend itself to articulate feedback. you hafto also keep in mind to do this appropriatly a mage would no longer be able to equip an actual shield and that these spells would hafto be used in THEE closest settings for combat , regardless the mage is...

Currently there is a large disparity between PURE Mage player (INT based damage) and Pure footies (STR based damage) The Disparity is the gap of dmg Between melee AND ranged combat. A pure strength build gains BOTH melee and ranged damage availability based off of Strength both MELEE and...

the weapon switching does need some work but for all clades.

I really think humans just need to be the best magic class for clades. instead of a ressist active it should be a magic bonus active or both.

hell nah lmao you wanna make humans just crafters? lmao my hope is that eventually anybody will be able to access other races clade"gifts" through either potions skill or spells so that this whole thing just balances itself out.

bumpskie

i mean you could just make murderers with more then lets say 20 murders have a red name and make it so its not a criminal action to attack them. they could enter towns that they have good rep in but players could still attack them. this is absolutely beneficial for TC

i dont believe we should gut pets.

the problem here is theres always a devide between group and solo play. if you can close the gap in solo play your also closing the gap in group play. in order to make the game fun for all styles of play a mage should be able to 1v1 a footie and have a decent rate of success. should the footie...

light -0 dex >medium -2 dex >heavy -3 dex per piece. problem solved.

its sounds like if guards where added they were added there because you revealed a glaring oversight that wont work well for new players when the game launches on epic. from what i understand all nations will be expanding before TC to provide high/med/low levels of protection away fromt here...

sounds like an in depth system but i really feel like just having red names will solve alot of issues especially on epic launch.

your posts are ignorant of actual issues being discussed. please make an intellegent post when includeing yourself, otherwise please refrain from this childish behaviour.

these are all useful changes.

Its important to try to push this issue as it fixes a major game flaw for solo mages that dont want to be dominators or tamers or hyrbid dagger users. at the moment the magery bothers me because it doesnt fit the "lore" in my head and im sure of most mages as to what they would like to see or...

lol yah they just need a spell that allows them to augment brawling. without making it another spell school. one for offense and one for defense. doing this in the ecumenical school makes the most sense. (reactive armour) - gives the ability to block *magicly* with brawling (harm*touch...

the game doesnt borrow heavily from realism WTF are you playing at? there is some realism where its needed for sure. but to say heavily is an overstatement. this will be my last reponse in this post as it doesnt actually pertain to the topic at hand.

your analogy is garbo no offense. were talking about a fantasy game and balance IN reality its survivle of the fittest. your argument to realism is detractive and no where near where you should be thinking to provide a valuable solution. if your goal is to dead end the conversation and became a...

yah but have you ever magicly punched someone with a helmet on. your posts are detractive from the topic. you want to skew this into realism now for the benfit of your argument/opinion to dilute my motive of balance in a fantasy game.