When would I willing pay a sub to MO2?

[Aegis301]

I was asked the above question today. I have another post about what would revitalize MO2, so I will just copy/paste the ONE thing that would make me willing pay a sub right now.

1. Player House- A game of this type is not meant to be played, locked in cities. You should be able to spawn at your house, and also stable mounts there. You should be able to share ownership as well. Locking new players inside cities with large RPK guilds such as BEAR, is not a good thing. TLDR, you should be able to LIVE out of your house.

If this was implemented fully, I would pay for MO2 right now. Granted, I played MO1 and love full loot pvp games...so my bar is kinda low.

Add this fully, and you have my money.

 

[ArcaneConsular]

Yeah houses kind of just glorified chests at this point. But since you can't respawn in them or store a horse there it's not that useful besides for butchering.

 

[Midas]

Adding ankh's to a house instead of priests would be wise. i think its pretty lame that just because u own a keep you get a red priest too , its only an issue to me because i cant rez at a house but these guys get a red priest just camping outside there fortress? An in game statue would suffice to fix this problem in my opinion , when added to a house you should be able to respawn their and set it as your home....like home...