Do you know why poor people keep hardcore games alive? Because they tend to have the most hours to spare, and play the game.
Give the poor ones an in-game grind to pay for their sub and they will do it.
The whole reason I got into hardcore RPGs and other games was because
I used to be poor.
This game needs to grow, and the whole reason it's reliant on a sub fee is because that's mostly stunted by gatekeeping.
Besides me wanting to see the game grow, with more people such as poor students from Russia and stuff (as mentioned by a previous comment), there are also personal ones.
People who are able to pay 15$ for
every month they play the game have jobs. I have a job.
However, the difference is, since I work weird hours I am not always able to pour in to
make that month of sub fee worth the time.
I'm ending up having to squeeze time in or else that 15$ for that whole month will only be used for say, 4 days of gameplay.
Honestly would be okay with the sub if I had more regular hours, since most of the workforce in my pay scale (upper middle class) have that.
I'm hoping the pandemic would make that change for me, but that's still yet to be seen.
Also, assuming that just because people can afford X means they can afford Y is a gross overestimation. Take into account the vast diversity of decisions being made by each individual.
For instance, at the time I got my PC as a gift, I was not able to afford one; with this job, I would now have been able to, so my funds went elsewhere, such as investments, renting out spaces, bills etc. Mind you, people in the same "middle class" as me pour
more in to investments and such to grow what they already earn which--while their net worths are higher--sets them back for what they can spend on for some time, until they get said returns on investments. Saying that just because someone is "rich"
they should be able to afford something is an assumption that pulls away from the otherwise smart decisions those people make with their money, and the costs they had to cover.
When someone buys something in Year X, doesn't always mean they'll be able to afford it again in Year Y.