So.. As someone who has murdered over a hundred people, someone informed me this would take around 700-800 hours of ingame time to go down. At this point i feel like waiting for it to go down is pointless, and i should just keep going as i am.
What i'm saying is, this murder count is just pushing me to murder more, because it feels like a point of no return.
Now, yes, i'm such an awful person etc, but this is just a game. Let's not get real life morality wrapped up in what is just a video game. I'm not a bad person for murdering people in a game. Let's keep it rational.
This length of time is basically forcing me to forever commit to being a criminal.. Unless you think i'm going to play for 800 hours without killing someone..
Now, i've got to ask. .Is this the desired intention? Do people want murderers to be pushed past what is essentially a point of no return? Because that means a world with more murderers. Is this what people want?
It means murderers have nothing to lose by murdering.
It isn't really a punishment, i'm used to the murderers life now...That point of no return feels like there is nothing to hold me back or pull me back into being a non-murderer again..
So i'm wondering why there isn't perhaps a cap on max murders to stop this timer getting to this point of no return.. That way there is always the temptation of getting roped back into being blue as opposed to being completely liberated from that temptation like how i feel now.
Blues.. Do you want more or less murderers?
Also, it should be less punishing going red in general.. Why do i feel this way? Because the crim town markets are dead. This is a huge indicator that it is too harsh to be a red name. Putting in a murder cap let's people feel they can more freely go red and thus allow the crim town market to pick up a bit more than they currently are. They're literally dead at the moment.
As for what the murder cap should be? Who knows. 20? 30? 40?
Anyone who is tired of being red, and lacks the patience to wait 800 hours ( which is reasonable), is just another player lost from the game. By being so strict, it literally pushes players away from playing the game.
What i'm saying is, this murder count is just pushing me to murder more, because it feels like a point of no return.
Now, yes, i'm such an awful person etc, but this is just a game. Let's not get real life morality wrapped up in what is just a video game. I'm not a bad person for murdering people in a game. Let's keep it rational.
This length of time is basically forcing me to forever commit to being a criminal.. Unless you think i'm going to play for 800 hours without killing someone..
Now, i've got to ask. .Is this the desired intention? Do people want murderers to be pushed past what is essentially a point of no return? Because that means a world with more murderers. Is this what people want?
It means murderers have nothing to lose by murdering.
It isn't really a punishment, i'm used to the murderers life now...That point of no return feels like there is nothing to hold me back or pull me back into being a non-murderer again..
So i'm wondering why there isn't perhaps a cap on max murders to stop this timer getting to this point of no return.. That way there is always the temptation of getting roped back into being blue as opposed to being completely liberated from that temptation like how i feel now.
Blues.. Do you want more or less murderers?
Also, it should be less punishing going red in general.. Why do i feel this way? Because the crim town markets are dead. This is a huge indicator that it is too harsh to be a red name. Putting in a murder cap let's people feel they can more freely go red and thus allow the crim town market to pick up a bit more than they currently are. They're literally dead at the moment.
As for what the murder cap should be? Who knows. 20? 30? 40?
Anyone who is tired of being red, and lacks the patience to wait 800 hours ( which is reasonable), is just another player lost from the game. By being so strict, it literally pushes players away from playing the game.
Last edited: