D
Deleted member 44
Guest
Draco armor is under performing for it's defense values relative to how challenging it is to obtain the armor. Please buff the blunt or slashing values.
It's only three points better than merc plate and six less in slashing. You run that and get into a fight on foot and you're gimping yourself.thought it was MA armor.
It's only three points better than merc plate and six less in slashing. You run that and get into a fight on foot and you're gimping yourself.
yeah, I know. It's also a bit lighter if you are gonna use OP mats. I do think the spread is weird (I don't see a lot of rhyme/reason to many of their spreads tbh,) but I mean, it's obvious what they were going for. Could use some slash, I guess, but I'd def leave the blunt low. Someday MC is going to be useful.
It's not like they are going thru and testing these armors like avg dmg v x bow or v x GB... it just seems like they are pulling numbers. That being said I do think that having mega pierce does have its own advantages. Even Merc plate is mostly a pierce based armor and it's advantageous in comparison. I mean what even is Risar Soldier armor? I'm confused about a lot of it. Why is draco a heavy armor? It's weird... games weird.
Strap on your tung draco w/ a lowbow and fight a MA zerg dolo. I guess in the end you'd stam enough to where they could dismount and catch you tho... but 'the draco theory' as SV conceived of it is pierce... but yea I dunno if adding slash to make it more like merc would make it op or not.
I just don't agree with this. The best armor in the game is cronite/iron fur merc plate. It weights 22. Every fighter in the game can wear this. "Light" plate armor is just worthless at end game.i also would say it would be to op if they buff it.
Highest pierce and lightest plate armor right now. If we get it buffed we see Draco armors only.
Agree on thisIf its MA armor then why are the sholders unusable for MAs?
If its MA armor then why are the sholders unusable for MAs?