Agree and disagree option of the forum

Are you for or against adding a function on the Agree and disagree forum posts

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 75.0%
  • No

    Votes: 1 25.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Embuscade

New member
Feb 11, 2021
16
6
3
Add a like function to the forums, to ‘Agree’ or ‘Disagree’ forum posts, to make people's suggestions easier to read.

Facebook's emotions don't make it easy to communicate with people by making fun of them or making fun of them, and I've rarely agreed wholeheartedly with a post.

Because I see a lot of people writing posts, but they're each more disgusting than the next, between those who complain, those who say half the things without really specifying what they're saying, and finally we understand nothing because it's muddled.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CherryKush

CherryKush

Well-known member
Jan 25, 2022
270
326
63
Add a like function to the forums, to ‘Agree’ or ‘Disagree’ forum posts, to make people's suggestions easier to read.

Facebook's emotions don't make it easy to communicate with people by making fun of them or making fun of them, and I've rarely agreed wholeheartedly with a post.

Because I see a lot of people writing posts, but they're each more disgusting than the next, between those who complain, those who say half the things without really specifying what they're saying, and finally we understand nothing because it's muddled.
Maybe once UE6 is in they'll have more time... Till then all hands on deck have been working on Boats and Dragons for 3 years...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Teknique

Teknique

Well-known member
Jun 15, 2020
1,870
1,401
113
Maybe once UE6 is in they'll have more time... Till then all hands on deck have been working on Boats and Dragons for 3 years...
Look bro, at what point can Henrik just admit that he has the worst execution skills in history next to Justin Trudeau. It’s not that the ideas are bad, except for the ones that he himself comes up with. He just needs to worry about getting good and swap himself out of the roster
 

ronuk

New member
Aug 5, 2024
17
8
3
Great idea. It would also make sense to gather the top 5 suggestions and implement something based on them. Otherwise, there is no point in having feedback/suggestions if no one pays attention to them
 

Sally

Active member
Dec 2, 2023
185
123
43
Nope, if you do this it will turn into reddit. Reddit allows terrible ideas to thrive based on popular opinion. A real forum is not a popularity contest.

Reddit is a place where the comfortable lie thrives over the harsh truth, it is full of some of the most low IQ and emotionally sensitive individuals, and systems like that should be avoided at all costs.

If you cannot argue your point, and prove what is being said wrong with your words, then your opinion shouldn't matter. Reddit allows people to stop a valid argument without providing a counter argument. This means a bunch of useless stupid people can bury a very valid and useful point. That is not good, which is why reddit is not good; and why this type of system should be avoided.
 
Last edited:

Embuscade

New member
Feb 11, 2021
16
6
3
Nope, if you do this it will turn into reddit. Reddit allows terrible ideas to thrive based on popular opinion. A real forum is not a popularity contest.

Reddit is a place where the comfortable lie thrives over the harsh truth, it is full of some of the most low IQ and emotionally sensitive individuals, and systems like that should be avoided at all costs.

If you cannot argue your point, and prove what is being said wrong with your words, then your opinion shouldn't matter. Reddit allows people to stop a valid argument without providing a counter argument. This means a bunch of useless stupid people can bury a very valid and useful point. That is not good, which is why reddit is not good; and why this type of system should be avoided.
argumentation is always necessary, but here, for the little we have, we also have opinions based on no argumentation at all.

I recommend you learn more about Bayes' Theorem
 

Emdash

Well-known member
Sep 22, 2021
3,158
1,005
113
argumentation is always necessary, but here, for the little we have, we also have opinions based on no argumentation at all.

I recommend you learn more about Bayes' Theorem

There are two types of people: those who can get Henrik here and those who can't. Which one are you?

Clicking buttons isn't gonna make me feel any better about talking to walls.

You seem like a very industrious person. Get someone here who is actually listening and we can have a logic fair.
 

Sally

Active member
Dec 2, 2023
185
123
43
argumentation is always necessary, but here, for the little we have, we also have opinions based on no argumentation at all.

I recommend you learn more about Bayes' Theorem
Forget about whatever theorem that is. Allow me to explain how people work :

If someone sees a lot of people holding a certain belief about something, they are more likely to believe it. Humans are this way because it is how we survived, we learned from eachother and cooperated.

If a bunch of low IQs down vote something that is true, people tend to take the path of least resistance. Why? Because it is easier, and easy is comfortable. If there was a core motivation to sum up all of human behaviour, it is to avoid discomfort.

So someone sees bunch of people downvoted something? Well, it must be wrong then. By our nature, we will be biased towards thinking it is wrong.

This is why it is a TERRIBLE idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Teknique

Embuscade

New member
Feb 11, 2021
16
6
3
Forget about whatever theorem that is. Allow me to explain how people work :

If someone sees a lot of people holding a certain belief about something, they are more likely to believe it. Humans are this way because it is how we survived, we learned from eachother and cooperated.

If a bunch of low IQs down vote something that is true, people tend to take the path of least resistance. Why? Because it is easier, and easy is comfortable. If there was a core motivation to sum up all of human behaviour, it is to avoid discomfort.

So someone sees bunch of people downvoted something? Well, it must be wrong then. By our nature, we will be biased towards thinking it is wrong.

This is why it is a TERRIBLE idea.
Hi, I'm back after a long time, and I tend to agree, that's why only members with a certain number of posts should have access, those who argue the most, and to whom we give the most credits, so we need to create a genre equivalent to that on dota 2 https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Player_Behavior_Summary

Except that it would be for the Mortal Online 2 forum.