Search results

I agree at GMs. I think it's possible to have GMs that are players and unbiased, but they couldn't be big guild people etc. Like if Seb/Amadman was a GM (God forbid, right, @ him ) that wouldn't be a problem. It's just people that are soooo heavily invested in the game as well as MO does weird...

I encourage everyone to truly consider both options, wipe (not to offend anyone!) the memories of the vision, do not consider what WILL be done, but consider what you believe will be better for the health of the game. I am presenting two options which I will explain in a tiny bit more detail...

I see you're working on your writing skills, too! Almost a rhyme this time. (again-opin-contin-spin to those uninitiated!)

That's part of being a CEO, as I have repeated, you face a situation that is impossible, you laid out your plans beforehand, and then you reach the point where you start to see your plans are not going to work out. The only problem with this solution is that they are going to 'fake' it until...

That's actually untrue because anyone who has been around is gonna shrug off some anon. You have to be able to embrace your shortcomings and failures and still talk trash! Plus you still see people thru their words. Look at that strycio dude or whatever his name is. You can tell he's a bitch...

I appreciate the math. I say just keep adding more servers. There is a capacity per server, so fill it. I find it hard to believe that sub upkeep of like... 2000-3000 people is not enough to support a single server, each time. Shoot, look at most MMOs they have tonz of servers, and we can assume...

This is what I feel like... -y-aaa-awn- Sunday Morning! Coffee! No, but check it. We are in a weird spot because we've broken "the vision!" I dunno what movie or book, maybe some Philip K Dick shite, that you can think of, but we are in an alternate universe now. This is a truly historical...

You know what makes me sad, legit. I know (assume?) you guys are good at the game, but I don't understand why that doesn't translate into an ability to understand advanced concepts, especially consequences of changes. Even multiple instances of Myrland are better than Instances of blue towns...

In MO maybe, but not in a game where you have to time everything perfectly to make a shot, get open etc. lol. I've taken Ls in fighting games due to extensive lag and button mashing (not that I'm good at fighting games anyway,) but in sports games, esp games where timing matters: loool so...

Hmm. No, that's my PoV. haha. SV's MO is housing and TC. I've already explained in like every other thread they discussed this in that I believe they should make at least 1 instance more pvp friendly... like raising the baseline rep substantially and buffing parcel gain (at the very least, if...

No idea, never played rust, never seemed interesting haha. I just think a bit more pvp would spice up the TC-less world. I'm not even a hard pvper - shrug -, I just understand what it brings to the game. But ye, peace.

no thanks on instanced myrlands? lol, already happening. No thanks of them being not the exact copy? OK. Fair enough, your opinion is heard.

We got like 8000+ people waiting to flood in, my dood, how do you know that 2000 of them aren't going to enjoy a more free for all environment? Nobody said they aren't an asset. Obviously they are. Less content is lack of mobs, etc. People put houses by spawns so they can camp them, zzz. Some...

Do I? lol. It's nice, for you. What if it's not nice for me? What if... other people exist who it is not nice for? It's not game breaking to have houses, but it's kind of ugly. It's unnecessary, if the game hard-requires a house then I think the design is flawed. We will find out soon enough...

I remem in 2004 when I started playing NBA Live on PC competitively. It was all p2p connections. I can tell you a little under 100 ping was the only thing that was close to an offline environment. I beat people with wild pings (200 is a wild ping, that's like MO1 sweden from tx ping), but it's...

Like I said, one could be, easy, and people would still play and test it. Make it so that you can't move mats in and out. Another could be with a altered rep system, not a huge enough change to justify calling it a test server. How long do you envision this temporary solution will need to...

To quote "the Manflayer," define temporary? :) There is 0 reason why they shouldn't make the instances in some way different (more pvp w/e) than the main one. Explain me why, because they are temporary, that they should not? And we're talking months + prol @ temporary, assuming things go well...

u guyses gonna be surprises when da no building thing draws people opposed to pushes them away ;)

nay, I hated grief and mining alts. 40 bucks as a buy in for more queue-ers, I'mgud. :/ And if the 'fake instances' get going and they are smart enough to try things such as... easing pvp restrictions on one, making one a test sandbox that you can't take mats to-and-from (for trying out game...

It's not gonna happen caz laws. lol. I promise you that's the problem. If they can handle the legal red tape and all that, they prol will, but that, not money, is the problem. If it was just about dropping a server in NA, that would be EZ and already done.